Home > The Lean Post> Developing Students, Improving Universities
The Lean Post
Sharing how the world is making things better through lean.

Developing Students, Improving Universities

by Theresa Coleman-Kaiser
February 12, 2015

Developing Students, Improving Universities

by Theresa Coleman-Kaiser
February 12, 2015 | Comments (3)

Today, lean thinking in higher education is uncommon. As a rule, institutions that teach lean continuous improvement in their academic curricula or that have centers or institutes to educate the public struggle themselves to be practitioners in their own administrative processes. There’s the challenge of teaching lean thinking and the challenge of practicing it ourselves in the administrative processes of a university system.

In 2008, when Michigan Technological University’s own lean journey began, President Glenn Mroz introduced the principles of lean thinking to his administration and asked that a transformation begin at the university. Mroz knew what Balzer pointed out in Lean Higher Education (2010), which is that institutional processes link to the overall success of universities and directly benefit all constituents, particularly students. Our intent was to begin this journey by first using lean thinking in our everyday operations and also begin exposing students to lean principles through participation in improvement events. This directly aligned with our directive to “prepare students to create the future.” It also aligned with our strategic intent of distinctive and rigorous, action-based, experiential learning, responding to the needs and challenges of the 21st century.

At Michigan Tech, we’ve found many compelling reasons to seek out a continuous improvement methodology we can use as a foundation upon which students could build academic and career success and that would also be effective in improving our own administrative processes.

Value Stream Mapping
Fishbone Problem-Solving

Here’s where we’ve focused our energies:

  • Accreditation. The University’s accreditation is dependent upon demonstrating continuous improvement in both academic and administrative areas. We’re working on creating and sharing demonstrable methods for improving administrative processes. Demonstrating and measuring improvements builds our credibility and strengthens the assurance argument necessary for university accreditation through the Higher Learning Commission.
  • Cost of Education. As is the case in many states, Michigan has experienced shrinking state allocations for higher education. To keep the resulting rise in tuition costs as low as possible, employing lean continuous improvement methodologies help contain costs. Cost savings that can be used to off-set tuition increases have been generated through a variety of improvement events ranging from reducing days of inventory on hand in our dining services to reducing fuel costs at our golf course by adjusting mowing patterns and frequencies.
  • Quality. Improved administrative processes elevate and strengthen the student experience. This is done by saving time, reducing waste, and avoiding cost while delivering the expected service to students. This helps Michigan Tech retain students.
  • State Initiatives. Since 2010, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder has supported service and process optimization and lean practices through the Office of Good Government. As a state institution, at Michigan Tech we’ve aligned with these efforts.
  • Universal application. Lean thinking and practice have daily application in all aspects of the business and academics of the university. Part of our work has been about simply spreading this thinking throughout administrative and academic offices.
  • Pull. Companies recruiting Michigan Tech graduates have told us they are looking for students with exposure to and proficiency in lean continuous improvement. We’ve worked to share this information with students through employing students in our Office of Continuous Improvement, by including students in kaizen events, and by sharing lean knowledge through our Leaders in Continuous Improvement student organization
  • Academic curricula. Most importantly, adopting a continuous improvement methodology integrated with an academic curricula is what makes a difference for students’ overall learning experience. Currently, we have 22 quality-related courses on different aspects of lean and continuous improvement are being taught as part of a diverse curricula on our STEM campus.

Successes So Far

Michigan Tech’s lean transformation has its foundations in a network of over 20 trained improvement facilitators from all areas of campus. These volunteers range from hourly employees to executives who work to facilitate improvement events requested by departments. Initially the university engaged outside consultants to provide facilitator training, some of which was funded by the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services through a labor/management-focused grant. Currently an Office of Continuous Improvement is staffed by a Manager and a team of student Process Improvement Coordinators that provide training and support the lean efforts on campus.

A student organization called Leaders in Continuous Improvement was formed two years ago and continues to grow in size and interest. Over 650 university employees have been exposed to lean thinking and over $250,000 in savings have been identified through formal improvement events.

Ongoing Challenges

The culture of higher education poses challenges when rolling out a lean transformation. Some are unique to higher ed and others are more universal. Here’s what we’ve experienced:

  • Unwillingness to view students as “customers”
  • Difficulty translating lean’s manufacturing history into knowledge work
  • Discomfort in learning as you’re doing
  • Focus on the visible use of tools instead of the underlying thinking
  • Oversimplifying Lean as the application of just one or two tools (5S and visual displays)
  • Push back on standard work as “dumbing things down” and wringing out the creativity and intellectual freedom

What’s Next

We plan to continue designing courses to prepare lean-certified students who are ready to work in industry. This will require the endorsement and participation of academic leadership, as well as continuing to also practice lean improvements in the administrative processes of the university. Our goal is to serve as a co-curricular learning laboratory for students, teaching lean thinking while also assisting in the university’s success.

We’d like to hear from you. Do you think that higher education can provide students with an immersive experience that brings together both the academic curriculum and the co-curricular companion piece of administrative processes and extra-curricular activities? Tell us your thoughts in the comments. We’re particularly interested in hearing success stories that we can learn from!

The views expressed in this post do not necessarily represent the views or policies of The Lean Enterprise Institute.
Keywords:  education,  learning,  Transformation
Search Posts:
5S - Visual Workplace
Mike Kobashi & Sammy Obara
Value-Stream Mapping: a Methodology for Sustainable System Improvement
Jim Luckman, Judy Worth, Karl Ohaus & Tom Shuker
Mapping to See: Value-Stream Improvement Workshop
By John Shook, Beau Keyte, Jim Luckman, et al.
Was this post... Click all that apply
HELPFUL
14 people say YES
INTERESTING
32 people say YES
INSPIRING
16 people say YES
ACCURATE
17 people say YES
Related Posts
3 Comments | Post a Comment
Sarah Topham February 12, 2015
2 People AGREE with this comment

Terrific post! Here at the Rochester Institute of Technology we have begun applying lean thinking in ITS (Information Technology Services) and more recently have branched out to complete some work within Student Financial Services, Academic Affairs and Student Affairs.  Our experiences, although more limited than yours, is very similar.

Our ITS work has included (and continues to include): introducing Lean Thinking across the ITS organization, implementing and improving standard ITS processes, expanding our number of Lean Leaders and most recently introducing the concept of Strategic Policy Deployment. Specifically to students we have implemented a Student IT Office and among other competencies they are introduced to Lean and complete projects to achieve Yellow Belt certification. 

I appreciate your post and would be interested in connecting directly talk further!

 

Sarah

 

Reply »

Theresa Coleman-Kaiser February 12, 2015
2 People AGREE with this reply

Thanks for your comment Sarah.  I'm always happy to hear about other universities that are practicing lean in their administrative areas.  I am particularly impressed that your journey started in the ITS area.  Yes, we should connect and talk further....perhaps I could have our IT area conncect and learn from your experiences.

Theresa

Reply »

Bob Emiliani February 12, 2015
1 Person AGREES with this comment

Hi Theresa - Nice work! Regarding the challenges that you still face, most faculty need to hear it from another faculty member before they will get on board.

A couple of e-books that I have written (free for Amazon Prime members), should be of some help: The Lean Professor and We Can Do It! One-on-one contact is even better than reading about it.

See also http://www.leanprofessor.com/blog/

Reply »

Search Posts:
5S - Visual Workplace
Mike Kobashi & Sammy Obara
Value-Stream Mapping: a Methodology for Sustainable System Improvement
Jim Luckman, Judy Worth, Karl Ohaus & Tom Shuker
Mapping to See: Value-Stream Improvement Workshop
By John Shook, Beau Keyte, Jim Luckman, et al.
Grasping the Real Situation
What Should Lean Mean to Us?
You Can't Learn Lean by Talking About It
"What Did I Transform Today?"