Home > The Lean Post> Leading with Respect is Not a Soft Skill: An interview with Mike Orzen

Leading with Respect is Not a Soft Skill: An interview with Mike Orzen

by Cameron Ford & Mike Orzen
October 15, 2015

Leading with Respect is Not a Soft Skill: An interview with Mike Orzen

by Cameron Ford & Mike Orzen
October 15, 2015 | Comments (6)

Leadership is not often thought of as a hard skill, but Mike Orzen says it should be. I recently sat down with Mike to get his take on why leaders should view and treat it as a hard skill, specifically in the case of the Michael and Freddy Balle-developed lead with respect model: 

What is the lead with respect model?

The lead with respect (LwR) model is about addressing both pillars of creating a highly effective organization. The two supporting elements are continuous improvement and respect for people – and what we find in almost every organization is that we're very fluid in continuous improvement and the tools associated with it, but we really don’t invest much time or thoughtful effort in respect for people. The majority of leaders will say, “Of course I respect my people! They’re my most important asset,“ which is wonderful, but building a culture of respect for people requires well-defined behaviors, shared practices, and a clear roadmap. The LwR model gives us that through seven core practices.

Whats the danger of focusing exclusively on the continuous improvement column and disregarding the respect column?

By itself, a tools-based approach creates a temporary “sugar high” with only superficial engagement, leading to short-lasting, shallow changes that rarely sustain themselves. Tools are enticing because they are fun to learn, give the appearance of progress, and support an implementation methodology. This is where we think we know the solution and believe that if we just roll out the right set of tools a transformation will take hold. It’s a myth! Ignoring the second pillar of LwR is like trying to build a house with a single column. For years, we have known that a lean transformation requires two supports: continuous improvement and respect for people.

By definition, a hard skill is a teachable skill that can be defined and measured. That doesn’t sound like leadership – in this regard, how can LwR be a hard skill?

Great question. Leadership applying LwR is definitely a skill that can be taught. It’s true that when we hear terms like “lead with respect” or “leadership” or “connecting with people” we often label them as soft skills, which are more associated with getting along with others. But while LWR has some elements of a soft (social) skill, let’s not forget that the ultimate purpose of LwR is to drive performance and measurable results. When we focus on improving process through the development of people, the outcome is measurable and sustainable performance - and that characterizes a hard skill that can be taught, modeled, coached, and measured.

So LwR can be defined as a hard skill in that once it is learned it produces measurable results?

Exactly. There is nothing soft about it - you can measure and quantify the impact of LwR. As we engage our teams applying the principles of LwR, we develop higher levels of communication, trust, teamwork, engagement, and accountability. The measurable impact is the improvement of performance numbers through these developed skills. That includes everything from financials, to productivity, to talent retention, to quality, to delivery time, to safety. LwR is also a hard skill because it’s a difficult skill. It’s difficult in the sense that instilling new behaviors in ourselves is the hardest challenge we have as human beings. And in order to succeed we need to learn and then practice these behaviors consistently until they become the habits that define our leadership style. 

What does the model look like in practice?

The main quality you’ll notice in a leader who’s embraced the LwR model as a hard skill set is a challenging and engaging, yet very humble leadership style – meaning that they’re comfortable knowing and admitting that they don’t have all the answers. They realize that their role is to engage and challenge employees to constantly improve their skills to better manage work processes. This fosters respect within a culture of mutual trust and you’ll hear employees saying things like, “I feel valued in my job,” “I felt challenged today,” “I had a great conversation with my boss today” and "I feel trusted.” I think Joe Maddon, coach of the Chicago Cubs, captured it well when he said: “If you focus on the outcome, there can be fear. If you focus on the process, you can be fearless.” LwR is all about creating deep connections with people to eliminate fear and foster new levels of engagement and self-assumed accountability.

That sounds great. But what can go wrong when a leader doesn’t view LwR as a hard skill requiring learning and practice?

The leader who only perceives LwR as a soft skill may conclude that it is optional and won’t see the need to examine their leadership style or practice new behaviors. As a result, they’ll focus less on employee development and instead try to fix things themselves by telling people what to do. Their leadership style comes across to others as essentially saying, “I’m really not listening to your opinion; I’m just waiting for you to stop talking so I can tell you what to do.” A leader can implement visual management and standard work and other tools, but they won’t amount to anything because as soon as the lean consultant or coach pushing the lean transformation is out of the room, all lean thinking and behavior comes to a halt and the transformation fails. And this happens primarily because the leader doesn’t have the correct perspective on the nature of LwR.

The views expressed in this post do not necessarily represent the views or policies of The Lean Enterprise Institute.
Was this post... Click all that apply
HELPFUL INTERESTING INSPIRING ACCURATE
28 people say YES
43 people say YES
22 people say YES
21 people say YES
Related Posts
6 Comments | Post a Comment
Ralph McDermott October 15, 2015

Very good points!  Leading with Respect is a difficult skill which is probably why it doesn't always get the attention it deserves.  Listening attentively, offering thoughtful responses, and putting aside preconceived notions are not always easy, but the payoff is huge! 

Oh, and since my Red Sox are out, GO CUBBIES!!

Reply »

Mark Graban October 15, 2015
3 People AGREE with this comment

I still don't understand the distinction between "soft skill" and "hard skill." What's the value of those labels?

The problem is when a leader thinks things like respect or listening are "optional." 

I don't know if you CAN teach some of this... is humility a skill that can really be taught? Does anybody suddenly become humble in a Lean journey?

 

Reply »

Jim Rohen October 19, 2015
1 Person AGREES with this reply

I like the Joe Madden analogy.  Focus on the means (people, process) and the end will take care of itself.  It is very difficult to get leadership to embrace this.  Often we feel we are too busy to work on the "low level" or fundamental (root causes) because of the "high level" issues that have become a priority.  What many leaders don't realize is that the reason they are too busy to work on problems where they originate is because they are not working on problems where they originate.  This starts with the people - listen and respect the Team Member, Team Leader, etc.  They are the experts.

Reply »

Dusty Chavez October 22, 2015

Now that the Cubbies are out it is time to plan for the next season investing time.

In a LwR model leaders must invest time to allow the team to work through processes and respect ideas that may or may not work. The key here is "time" this will then lead to innovation and overall satisfaction resulting in improved results.

 

Reply »

AhmadAl-Ani October 24, 2015
1 Person AGREES with this comment

Isn't it true that most of the known soft or interpersonal skills lead (or should lead) to measurable results and outcomes, and they are difficult to learn ?

Reply »

Joshua Kenney July 09, 2016

My recent interest in our lean journey is "Leading with Respect." I agree that it can be taught; however, without humility, no one can lead with respect.

To add to the Mike's thought, leading with respect to me means:

(1) Being fast to listen to others when I engage with them.

(2) To never underestimate the know how of the problem solver, and never think the problem solver is not fit for the position they hold, especially when he/she pushes back or has a different opinion.

(3) To never backstab someone simply because he/she has difficulty adjusting to a new way of thinking. I would rather look at my approach, work hard on it until I win the person.

(4) To find a correct balance between providing direction to get results and listening to grow your relationships.

I guess there is more to this than these four opinion of mine.

 

Reply »

Intentional Respect
A Lean Leap of Faith