Adding Cost or Creating Value?
I was out on tour this past week, listening to companies' stories as they try to achieve a "lean" transformation. And I was struck, as I often am, by confusing terminology. The companies I visited thought they were "adding value" but I mostly watched them adding cost. So let me try to clarify things.
I always use the term "creating value" rather than the more familiar "adding value" because the former is the voice of the customer while the latter is the voice of the accountant. Companies add up their costs - both bought-in materials and internal spending on capital and labor plus their margins - then subtract the cost of their purchased items to determine how much "value" they have "added". The problem is that this leaves out the customer, the only one who can determine value. Often, what a company really means by "adding value" is "adding cost". Whether the extra cost creates any value is known only to the customer, and many managers never ask!
A quick example, in case I haven't been clear: Let's suppose a company buys some nuts and some bolts and assembles them into a simple product. These purchased items clearly are costs. Then lets suppose the company uses a lot of labor to store these parts, take them to the point of assembly, assemble them, rework the defective items, store the assembled goods, hunt for missing items, and then ship them. Finally, let's suppose that the bought-in items cost 50 units and the selling price for the finished product is 100 units. Clearly the company must have "added" 50 units of "value". Right? Wrong!
From the customer's standpoint this company may only have added fifty units of "cost" including its margin, and created very little value. The reason is simply that most of the steps consuming the resources - storing the parts, hunting for them, reworking them - added cost but no value from the perspective of the customer. Customers actually would have thought the product was more valuable (and been willing to pay more) if these steps had been left out and the product had been delivered faster!
Because products come as a bundle of value and costly waste and because the firms in most industries currently mix the two, customers often have no choice but to purchase the waste along with the value. But what if some lean thinking firm in your industry separates value from waste and eliminates the waste? If that isn't your firm, watch out!
Words aren't a substitute for action, but the wrong words often get in the way of the right actions if managers can't tell the difference between value and cost. So I hope lean thinkers will sharpen their language to focus on actually creating value, often by eliminating unnecessary costs.
President and Founder
Lean Enterprise Institute
Back to Basics: Jim Womack on Why Managers Need a "Lean State of Mind"
In this classic eletter from 2009, Jim Womack explains the crucial importance of a "lean state of mind" if a lean manager is going to be able to achieve sustainable improvements.
Back to Basics: Jim Womack on Why You Should Never Create an A3 Alone
In this eletter from 2008, Jim Womack (in honor of the then-recent publication of "Managing to Learn") shares invaluable advice for a problem that too many A3 writers get hung up on. Read more to learn why you should never be a hero and try to write an A3 alone.
Working on the Management
Effective daily management is still hard to achieve for most organizations, says Jim Womack. But until line managers start tackling problems first hand as they emerge, rather than deferring and delegating them, basic stability will remain a mirage. Read more in this column from our sister publication, Planet Lean.
- Learing to See the Whole Value Stream: The Power of Value-Stream Mapping
- Sustaining Lean Goals by Taking a (Gemba) Walk
- Forward to Fundamentals
- Managing to Learn: Part 1 - How Lean Leaders Create Productive Problem-Solvers
- The Power of Purpose, Process, and People
- Lean Management & the Role of Lean Leadership
- Lean Solutions