Standardized Worrying

Permalink   |   Post a Comment   |  

Years ago when Dan Jones and I first visited Toyota in Japan, we were struck by something that seemed out of keeping with their continuing success.  They seemed to worry all the time.  We met managers who had just accomplished remarkable feats of muda removal during kaizen events and yet they couldn't seem to just relax and enjoy it.  Instead they were busy analyzing what they had just done and trying to think of ways it could be even better. Dan and I began to say to ourselves, "Even smiling is muda at Toyota."

By contrast, kaizen events in other firms we have visited over the years have often been marked by celebrations and self-congratulation, no matter how much was really accomplished or how modest the improvement goal.

Recently, while reading's Jeff Liker's excellent new book "The Toyota Way", I came across the section on "hansei" or reflection, which for Toyota is the third step in their PDCA process for every improvement.  It helped me put in words what I've been feeling for years about the difference between kaizen at Toyota and at most other firms.

Toyota's idea is simply that every time we analyze a situation (the "P" for "plan" in PDCA) and then try a new way (the "D" for "do"), it's time to reflect very carefully (hansei) on what we have just done.  (This, of course, is the "C" for "check".)  In most companies the fact that the new performance of a system met expectations is the end of the discussion.  And if it didn't meet expectations, this is only to be expected with some experiments.  (Remember that controlled experimentation using the scientific method is what kaizen really is.)

But for Toyota it seems to be very different.  In their view, if the performance met expectations, surely they could have done even better.  The performance objective was too modest.  And if the performance did not meet expectations, something was wrong with the original plan and it is important to understand what and why.  Indeed, this is yet another use for the "five whys", but this time applied to the improvement process itself.

But note that in either case there is no room for celebrating what has been achieved even if the results are substantial or for celebrating the conduct of a noble experiment even if it failed.  The objective must be to either find out why it didn't work or why it didn't work even better.  In short, with hansei Toyota has a formula for standardized worrying!

Surely this seems harsh.  Can't these guys just have some fun?  But the sobering reality of life, at least for me, is that folks who worry every day about every thing are very likely to have little to worry about in the long run.  By contrast, those who grade their kaizen performance on how hard they tried -- whatever the results -- are likely to be very happy in the short term but soon may be looking for work.

So please give some thought to how you approach kaizen.  If no improvement in performance is ever good enough and if every kaizen failure undergoes meticulous analysis to understand exactly why it didn't work, you too will become a standardized worrier.  And, very likely, you will become a leader in a continuously successful enterprise.

Best regards,

Jim Womack
President and Founder
Lean Enterprise Institute

0 Comments | Post a Comment
Other Jim Womack Related Content



  • The Power of Personal Yokoten
    Personal yokoten to teach new mindsets and attitudes is an activity all of us can perform out in the world every day with every manager, team leader, and team we touch, says Jim Womack. He believes we can transfer new, lean ideas about management and leadership in our civic roles and even in our families as we think through tough issues.
  • The Power of Yokoten
    I’ve written a lot about yokoten in recent years – the practice of spreading good (lean) ideas horizontally between and across organizations from their point of initial success (“Yoko” means in Japanese horizontal.) It turns out that this is hard, even for the methods and tools needed to create lean value streams. Lean requires practice, even when the theory is clear and simple, and it’s hard to find enough teachers with enough experience and time to lead the cycles of practice needed for sustainable yokoten.
  • How A Complete Lean Production System Fuels Global Success
    In this article prepared for the 2007 relaunch of the seminal book The Machine that Changed the World, co-author Jim Womack correctly forecast Toyota's rise, and identifes the key elements of a dynamic lean production system.