Home > The Lean Post> Sharks & Tortoises
The Lean Post
Sharing how the world is making things better through lean.

Sharks & Tortoises

by Jeff Morrow
February 19, 2015

Sharks & Tortoises

by Jeff Morrow
February 19, 2015 | Comments (8)

I’m not talking about the ancient, robust species. No, I’m talking about the challenges of Toyota Way transformation that go all the way back to the concept of resilient, organic growth.

In bizspeak, “organic growth” means growing by finding ways to reliably create new value, something that goes beyond reducing price or acquiring another firm and adding its revenue to yours. Usually this means entering new markets or bringing valuable novelty to familiar ones, both of which can entail serious risk if you don’t have the right stuff (consider the Edsel, the Newton, Google Glass, etc.). 

We contrast organic growth with a relatively new growth strategy based on acquiring aging mass production firms and “cLeaning up” production… reducing inventory/smoothing flow – a non-trivial undertaking to be sure – thereby dropping nice size bundles of cash directly to the bottom line. This healthy new cash flow then funds the next cLean up target acquisition. And so on and so on. It’s a lovely virtuous circle, especially when capital is inexpensive. 

Understanding Shark Behavior 

Over the past 25 years a small number of firms have grown spectacularly in revenue, employees, and stock price by using this cLean up strategy and executing crisply on tactics. “Spectacular” as in the 200x revenue growth, 65x employee growth, and 20x stock price growth kind of spectacular. Think of them as lean sharks: always moving and always feeding, finding fat manufacturing firms and reliably leaning them out with parachuted SWAT squads.

With a shark strategy some Toyota Way thinking does leak out from the shop floor, but it’s mighty tempting to stay focused on finding the next “quick win” acquisition rather than on the hard, time-consuming work needed to truly transform managerial and design knowledge workers’ thought-worlds and behavior in other parts of the enterprise. Transformation of non-production parts of an enterprise is hard and time-consuming because it’s hugely tangled and complex. Corporate strategy, customers’ voices, competitors’ moves, technology development, finance, supply network development, product development – all of these things affect each other and affect the whole. Further, WIP here is mostly a fluffy cloud of ideas instead of widgets you can touch and count, so “managing to see problems” is an idea that gets complicated fast.

Still, what’s not to like? Wouldn’t lean shark growth make any CEO handsomely compensated and board of directors proud? Well, no. Sooner or later opportunity to buy up and lean-out old firms dwindles. Either you buy them all up or you get competitors with the same strategy or both. In fact, it looks like this has started to happen to the more successful of these lean shark firms, in part because when you’re already a Great White, the bigger the acquisition you need to find and transform in order to move the percent-growth needle and keep stock market analysts happy. 

Understanding Tortoise Behavior

And then there are lean tortoises: bullet-proof firms like Toyota and its supply network. They are archetypal practitioners of “go slow to go fast.” When these firms acquire and transform they clean up production AND clean up leadership. For them it starts with careful selection of target firms that can build out into a network of supply capability that’s geographically well-situated. Then follows a decade or so of on-site nurturing of management that begins with the initial clean up, where key senior home-firm players spend long hours day in and day out grasping problems and coaching local execs to learn how to see and solve problems and to coach others.

In terms of expert effort and time per firm, this requires probably an order of magnitude greater than any lean shark expends. To recap, we’re talking about a “deep knowledge” Toyota Way acquiring firm, senior coaches, patient and persistent daily attention, a longer time horizon, and belonging to a group of like-minded, learning local firms like BAMA, Toyota’s supplier network in the southeastern U.S. These firms stand and grow on their own within an ecosystem of similar firms.

The Challenge for Sharks (or for the Rest of Us?) 

30 years or so of lean transformation efforts have shown us there’s pretty much nothing harder to change than default, automatic “thinking” and doing based on a reflection-free mental model and associated habits. For lean shark execs and design knowledge workers, we’re talking about default thinking like the following:

  • conventional managerial accounting and budgeting
  • management by objectives (MBO): “I empower you to do this FOR me, and if you can’t, I’ll empower someone else who can!”
  • stock market hypersensitivity
  • discipline-locked engineering and supplier development, etc.

All of these things can keep execs nearly blind to long term benefits of transforming their side of things. It hardly seems even worth a glance, a neatly comfortable and stagnant trap.

But without whole-enterprise transformation, gains in manufacturing start to plateau because the only value lever we can pull is manufacturing cost reduction. We’re not generating all that much novel value with new products. When cost reduction benefits start to taper off, causing profitability to sag and unfavorable stock market analyst attention to rise, we’re spurred to yet more acquisition-seeking and we go skim some fresh cream. The Shark’s virtuous circle begins to turn a little sour. 

So, what do you think? What will happen to the lean sharks? Is transforming from shark to tortoise a good idea? Can lean sharks even become tortoises? What would that take? In what ways does organic transformation depend on the approach that Tortoises have taken? What are the problems with that kind of transformation?

Along these lines, some exciting ways to tackle transformation of managerial and design knowledge work are beginning to surface. Mike Rother’s (and Jeff Liker’s and many others') Kata work goes right to the heart of what it takes to change behavior and thinking in a programmatic way that applies to anyone, executives included. LEI’s new focus on supporting a growing LPPD community of practice can help show just how energizing it is for everyone in the organization to share focus on creating and delivering cool, useful, sustainable products for customers. What other work in these areas do you see happening?

The views expressed in this post do not necessarily represent the views or policies of The Lean Enterprise Institute.
Search Posts:
Lean IT
Mike Orzen & Steve Bell
Lean Upstream
Durward Sobek
The Gold Mine
By Freddy Ballé and Michael Ballé
The Lean Manager
By Michael Ballé and Freddy Ballé
Was this post... Click all that apply
HELPFUL
14 people say YES
INTERESTING
23 people say YES
INSPIRING
15 people say YES
ACCURATE
11 people say YES
Related Posts
8 Comments | Post a Comment
kevin kobett February 19, 2015

Do you watch ABC's Shark Tank? Inventors pitch their new products to Mark Cuban, Lori Greiner, etc

The skills these inventors use are the same skills you want your employees to develop. Seems to be useful in motivating learning.

Reply »

Joel February 23, 2015

I have always enjoyed swimming with tortoises.....I do not personnally see how sharks will turn into tortoises. Common Corporate Cultures do not foster nor reward the idea of stopping, slowing down in order to go faster. Meanwhile, external market and conditions seldom support that idea either.....

Coincidentally....Mercedes have a fabulous 'SLS AMG launch animation video'.....the tortoise clearly wins! 

Reply »

Lyndis D February 24, 2015

Lean interventions should produce a mixture of shark and tortoise outcomes – the sharky quick wins which get the team on board and help them see the benefits of this new way of working, and simultaneously the tortoisey longer term proposals which look at deep seated issues. If you only do the shark stuff you’re missing the core issues and the culture change.

But the tortoise stuff is much trickier and demands infinite patience, not something we have the luxury of these days. Can we start a tortoise backlash?

Reply »

Jeff Morrow February 24, 2015

Thanks for the comments, folks (merci beaucoup, m. Joel!).

It seems we agree that Tortoise is hard, likely too hard, to do in the world of conventional thinking and pressures, and that both Sharks and Tortoises begin by transforming the shop floor.

There may be another species out there, perhaps some sort of large dinosaur, that tests lean evolution on the shop floor in isolated experiments. Some of these experiments succeed fairly dramatically but even so the old ways return. What evolutionary path do non-Tortoises follow? We know what finally happened to most of the dinosaurs ...

One big difference between Dinos and the other two: Dinos do experiments to see IF lean will work for them; for Sharks and Tortoises the experiments are HOW to make lean work.

Reply »

Jorge Peña February 28, 2015

my experience biases me to believe that any change from one state to another, regardless of the effort, requires confidence on the promised to-be state. And confidence has to be expressed in term of money. Hence change requires a monetary incentive. If you can show how being Lean or becoming lean delivers financial goodness, you will perhaps motivate adoption

Reply »

Jeff Morrow March 03, 2015

Jorge, you have hit the largest problem nail squarely on the head: why bother doing either Shark or Tortoise? Neither is close to easy and neither is close to conventional, so why should a board of directors take an enterprise in either of those directions? What's in it for them?

What answers to we have for Jorge? Will a strong business case that shows them the money do the trick?

Reply »

kevin kobett March 04, 2015

A company is profitable enough to have a board of directors considering a lean initiative. To me, this means someone(s) in this company is doing a great job. These employees have been unwittingly practicing lean. We need to find these stories and calculate cost savings.

Most likely only a small percentage of employees make the extra effort to change the process on their own accord. My guess is 1 in 20 max. Should expect at least a 20 fold increase in already present savings if full participation is achieved. Most likely, much greater than 20 fold.

These stories collected are the key in changing from a shark to a tortoise. Shark lean is easy due to the infinite opportunities for improvement. Tortoise lean is hard. Need to learn while still a child. This is easy. When the child outgrows Snow White, start telling lean stories. David McClelland predicted this storytelling was needed 50 years ago.

Reply »

Mert Cevik March 08, 2015

I believe sharks and tortoises are merely the creatures of nature and have their own purposes and place in their ecosystem. They are not good or evil, they are just some species who are adapted to the conditions.

Therefore, becoming a tortoise or shark is merely a choice. Any of two could be chosen depending on needs and concerns. However needs and concerns are also defined by humans and it is not unusual to see definitions that arise only from gut-feeling or guesses rather than measurements. (Please note I do not say reliable measurements, just measurements!)

My question is do the companies become a shark deliberately or they chose it in a delusion of finding a shortcut to a resilient and reliable growth? In other words, are there some companies who looks for becoming a tortoise and ended up with becoming a shark? -dinasaurs are out of this question they may end up with becoming anything in an attempt of transformation- 

At this point another question that comes to my mind is, if there are such cases how the needs and concerns are defined at the BoD level in these companies? 

 

 

Reply »

Search Posts:
Lean IT
Mike Orzen & Steve Bell
Lean Upstream
Durward Sobek
The Gold Mine
By Freddy Ballé and Michael Ballé
The Lean Manager
By Michael Ballé and Freddy Ballé
Cost Reduction, Waste, and Purpose
Problem Solving Fast and Slow
Profit and Cost At Toyota
The Battle for the Soul of Lean
"But TPS Doesn't Apply to Us...."
"We Are Unique"
'Twas the Night Before Kaizen