Lean Enterprise Institute Logo
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter Signup
  • Cart (0)
  • Account
  • Search
Lean Enterprise Institute Logo
  • Explore Lean
        • What is Lean?
        • The Lean Transformation Framework
        • A Brief History of Lean
        • Lexicon Terms
        • Topics to explore
          • Operations
          • Lean Product & Process Development
          • Administration & Support
          • Problem-Solving
          • Coaching
          • Executive Leadership
          • Line Management
  • The Lean Post
        • Subscribe to see exclusive content
          • Subscribe
        • Featured posts
          make awards logo 2023

          Two LEI Learning Group Partner Executives Honored...

          Leaper climbing to goal

          Understanding Lean Thinking and Practice Fundamentals

          • See all Posts
  • Events & Training
        • Leadership Coaching and Custom Training
        • What is a Co-Learning Partnership (CLP)?
        • Forms and Templates
        • Featured learning
          • Improvement Kata/Coaching Kata Remotely

            April 10, 2023 | Online Live Course

          • Developing Structured Problem-Solving and Leadership Skills using A3 Thinking: Managing to Learn Remotely

            April 17, 2023 | Online Live Course

          • Hoshin Kanri Remotely: Aligning and Executing on Your Organizational Objectives

            April 21, 2023 | Online Live Course

          • Designing the Future Remotely: A Lean Product Development Immersive Learning Experience

            April 24, 2023 | Online Live Course

          • See all Events
  • Store
        • Shopping Cart
        • Featured books
          Managing to Learn: Using the A3 management process

          Managing to Learn: Using the A3 management process

          Learning to See

          Learning to See

          • See all Books
  • About Us
        • Our people
          • Senior Advisors and Staff
          • Faculty
          • Board of Directors
        • Contact Us
        • Lean Global Network
        • Press Releases
        • In the News
        • Careers
        • About us

The Lean Post / Articles / Generating Multiple Alternatives is Not Necessarily Waste

Generating Multiple Alternatives is Not Necessarily Waste

Product & Process Development

Generating Multiple Alternatives is Not Necessarily Waste

By Katrina Appell, PhD

May 18, 2016

I was once asked: 'How is set-based design lean? Isnít designing multiple alternatives creating waste and the opposite of lean?'î writes Katrina Appell. It's true that generating multiple alternatives can seem like waste, especially since only one alternative will be used. But the reality is much different - read more.

FacebookTweetLinkedInEmailPrintComment

I was once asked: “How is set-based design lean? Isn’t designing multiple alternatives creating waste and the opposite of lean?”

This is a logical and reasonable question. It is always important to understand the purpose of a method, so you can hypothesize if it will solve your problem(s). Doing anything without understanding the purpose is waste. And since set-based design often requires an investment in order to shift resources up front in development, its purpose may be questioned even more. This is actually a benefit in disguise as it ensures we understand the purpose better. It is yet another counterintuitive lean method with the answer coming from the perspective you are looking from.

Depending on your perspective, there are many wastes associated with or avoided through learning about multiple alternatives. From just one product within the engineering department you could reasonably think that if you explore multiple alternatives, then all except the one you select will be waste. This is no different than optimizing vertically within a process or function instead of horizontally across the value stream.

The original question comes from a horizontal perspective that if you just select the best alternative before you start then every other alternative is waste. But both of these viewpoints are wishful thinking and happen to directly conflict with the core LPPD principles. They imply that the designer should automatically know which alternative is best, ignore the expensive and time-consuming iterative design changes that almost always occur when a single design is selected early, and will likely result in a sub-optimal design providing less value to the customer. These are all wastes that negatively impact customer value.

At the same time, designing multiple alternatives will indeed generate waste if you are not mindful about what you are learning and trying to create. Value is created in development through the creation of two things:

  1. Profitable operational value streams (product customer values and manufacturing system to produce).
  2. Usable knowledge that enables the creation of profitable operational value streams.

From the perspective of maximizing value in creating a profitable operational value stream, you should be maximizing value for the customer in the product and your ability to produce it. Exploring multiple alternatives paired with quick learning enables faster time to market and more customer value. But this only happens if you evaluate the alternatives from the perspectives of the customer and manufacturing system. If you are evaluating alternatives from different perspectives that the customer doesn’t value you could just be generating more waste.

And then there is the other value created in development – usable knowledge. While multiple alternatives are explored to optimize the product and manufacturing system, what happens to the knowledge created while learning about the alternative designs? If your perspective is just this one product and that knowledge gets discarded, it isn’t a waste.

Generating Multiple Alternatives is Not Necessarily Waste

But if you are looking at a product development system with other current and future products, discarded knowledge is indeed a waste. If you capture knowledge in a difficult-to-access medium that is also waste as it is unlikely to be retrieved for future programs. Whereas, if you capture knowledge in an easily accessible format, such as trade-off curves, you can leverage that knowledge on future projects to create more customer value.

FacebookTweetLinkedInEmailPrintComment

Written by:

Katrina Appell, PhD

About Katrina Appell, PhD

With over 15 years of coaching, facilitating, training, and team development experience, Katrina is passionate about supporting organizations in lean transformation. She has coached lean principles and practices at many companies in various industries, including Caterpillar, Michigan Medicine, Pella Windows & Doors, TechnipFMC, US Synthetic, and Whirlpool. At LEI, Katrina…

Read more about Katrina Appell, PhD

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related

Agile vs Lean Product and Process Development

Product & Process Development

How to Launch Better Products Faster

Article by Lean Leaper

hands at a table working together

Product & Process Development

Teaming Up to Overcome Common Business Challenges

Article by Katrina Appell, PhD and John Drogosz, PhD

Augment Book

Product & Process Development

Empowering Frontline Operators with Human-Centric Technology: a Conversation with Natan Linder

Podcast by Tom Ehrenfeld

Related books

The Power of Process – A Story of Innovative Lean Process Development

The Power of Process – A Story of Innovative Lean Process Development

by Eric Ethington and Matt Zayko

Welcome Problems, Find Success – Creating Toyota Cultures Around the World

Welcome Problems, Find Success – Creating Toyota Cultures Around the World

by Nate Furuta

Related events

April 24, 2023 | Online Live Course

Designing the Future Remotely: A Lean Product Development Immersive Learning Experience

Learn more

March 19, 2024 | Optional Post-Summit Workshops March 21-22
Carlsbad, California

Lean Summit 2024

Learn more

Explore topics

Product and Process Development graphic icon Product & Process Development
Executive Leadership graphic icon Executive Leadership

Join us on social

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Join our #LeanCommunity

Join us on slack
  • Privacy Policy
  • Sitemap
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook

©Copyright 2000-2023 Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lean Enterprise Institute, the leaper image, and stick figure are registered trademarks of Lean Enterprise Institute, Inc.

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Learn More. ACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
Share this ArticleLike this article? Email it to a friend!

Email sent!