Home > The Lean Post> When is technology in healthcare actually valuable?

When is technology in healthcare actually valuable?

by Judy Worth
August 7, 2013

When is technology in healthcare actually valuable?

by Judy Worth
August 7, 2013 | Comments (1)

Healthcare technology, including HIT (Healthcare Information Technology) is improving healthcare delivery in many different ways. Telemedicine allows physicians to remotely diagnose and prescribe treatment for patients in rural areas and remotely monitor patients in understaffed critical care units. Pacemakers can now tell the wearer when his or her heart rate is too fast. Patient portals permit patients to schedule appointments, view their records, request prescription refills, and ask questions of their providers. Kiosks are speeding up the check in process at clinics and hospitals.

On the other hand, technology always adds cost and may even create more work for the staff members who must use it. For example, as we learned in his presentation at the MHA (Michigan Health and Hospital Association) Keystone Center’s Annual Symposium on Patient Safety and Quality in April, Dr. Peter Provonost of Johns Hopkins recently observed that his hospital had to add a nurse FTE in critical care because the hospital’s new EMR and its computerized heparin infusion pumps didn’t talk to each other. That meant one nurse had to manually enter orders from the EMR for each infusion pump administering heparin four times a day and a second nurse, according to hospital policy, observed the order entry to ensure there were no errors. Some primary care practices have concluded that their new electronic health records are no better than spreadsheets; they’re just more costly and less user friendly.

Some technology actually puts patients at risk. On Father’s Day, Parade Magazine carried a “Smart Move of the Week” about apps that purport to help users distinguish normal moles from those that are cancerous. However, a 2013 study in JAMA Dermatol indicated that three of the four apps in the study incorrectly identified 30 percent of melanomas as benign.

Technology should support the worker (and the patient), not vice versa. Jeffrey Liker speaks to this in chapter 14 of The Toyota Way, "Principle 8: Use Only Reliable, Thoroughly Tested Technology That Serves Your People and Processes." The book Kaizen Express discusses this idea as well in the section, “Separating Human Work and Machine Work.” This will mean something different for each organization, but here are some possible implications for yours:

1)   Work flows/processes should be designed to deliver safe and effective care in the most efficient manner possible and HIT should be modified to support those processes, not the other way around.

2)   New technologies should be able to marry with existing technologies, not create workarounds for staff members who provide the linkage.

3)   New technologies should provide genuine value to their users (providers and patients), not just novelty.

How do you see technology improving (or not improving) the work in your organization? What are you doing to make sure technology is being used well?

The views expressed in this post do not necessarily represent the views or policies of The Lean Enterprise Institute.
Keywords:  healthcare,  IT,  musings
Search Posts:
Value-Stream Mapping for Healthcare
James (Beau) Keyte, Judy Worth & Tom Shuker
On the Mend
By John Toussaint, MD and Roger Gerard
Perfecting Patient Journeys
By Judy Worth, Tom Shuker, Beau Keyte, et al.
Was this post... Click all that apply
HELPFUL INTERESTING INSPIRING ACCURATE
11 people say YES
9 people say YES
5 people say YES
9 people say YES
Related Posts
1 Comment | Post a Comment
Ghassan Saleh August 26, 2013

"Technology should support the worker, not vice versa". Totally agree.
Improvement is about making things better, cheaper and/or faster. Quite often with technology based solution, people look at one or at best two of the three aforementioned dimensions. Technology sometimes make a aprocess faster, but not necessarily better or cheaper, or cheaper but not better...etc. The trap is automation for the sake of automation without carefully calculating the pros and cons.  For one reason people assume that any automated process is a better process without looking at wheather this will add value or not to the process or its outputs.

Thank you for such an intersting post.



Reply »

Search Posts:
Value-Stream Mapping for Healthcare
James (Beau) Keyte, Judy Worth & Tom Shuker
On the Mend
By John Toussaint, MD and Roger Gerard
Perfecting Patient Journeys
By Judy Worth, Tom Shuker, Beau Keyte, et al.
A Total Shift in Mindset
Talking Lean with a Neuroscientist
"Too Busy to Walk the Gemba"
'Twas the Night Before Kaizen
A Good Night’s Sleep